Carter v. State — Florida’s Sixth District affirmed without a written explanation

Case
Deangelo Lamont Carter v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Chief Judge Traver (Ron DeSantis, 2023); Judge Mize; Judge Pratt
Date Decided
September 1, 2026
Docket No.
6D2024-2426
Topics
Criminal Appeal, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Deangelo Lamont Carter appealed from a judgment of the Circuit Court for Charlotte County in lower-tribunal case number 2023-CF-000366. Circuit Judge Shannon H. McFee entered the ruling under review.

The Sixth District Court of Appeal’s opinion does not describe the underlying charges, Carter’s arguments on appeal, the State’s response, or the circuit court’s reasoning.

The Court’s Holding

The Sixth District affirmed the circuit court’s judgment in a per curiam decision.

The court supplied no reasoning, legal analysis, or citation to authority. Chief Judge Traver and Judges Mize and Pratt concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The circuit court’s judgment remains in place.
  • The appellate court resolved the case through a per curiam affirmance without a written explanation.
  • The opinion establishes no express rule of law and does not identify the issues Carter raised on appeal.

Why It Matters

The decision ends this stage of Carter’s appeal by leaving the lower court’s judgment undisturbed. Because the opinion contains no analysis, it offers practitioners no explanation of the panel’s reasoning or guidance on the substantive legal issues involved.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top