Tollaksen v. Stunkard — Second District Reverses in Corporate Buy-Sell Agreement Dispute, Finding Option Not Timely Exercised

Case
Tollaksen v. Stunkard
Court
Illinois Appellate Court, Second District
Date Decided
2026-05-29
Docket No.
2-24-0539, 2-24-0678 (cons.)
Judge(s)
Justice Birkett (Schostok and Mullen, JJ., concurring)
Topics
Corporate Governance, Buy-Sell Agreements, Option Rights, Shareholder Disputes
Source
Full opinion on CourtListener · PDF

Background

Scott Tollaksen, a shareholder in Lionheart Critical Power Specialists, Inc. and Lionheart Power Systems, Inc., filed suit against fellow shareholders William Stunkard, Donald Ritter, Kenneth Lenhart, and Michael Hunter, both individually and derivatively. The dispute centered on buy-sell agreements that governed the transfer of shares among shareholders.

The buy-sell agreements contained option provisions requiring the corporate defendants to exercise their repurchase rights within a 30-day contractual period. Tollaksen argued the corporations failed to exercise their options in strict conformity with the agreements within this timeframe. The circuit court granted summary judgment in favor of the defendants and found Tollaksen in contempt for related conduct, imposing sanctions and attorney fees.

The Court’s Holding

The Second District reversed in substantial part. The court held that the undisputed facts established the corporate defendants failed to exercise their option rights in strict conformity with the buy-sell agreements within the 30-day contractual period. Under Illinois law, option rights must be exercised in strict compliance with their terms — substantial compliance is insufficient.

The court further found Tollaksen was entitled to summary judgment on the corporations’ counterclaim for specific performance (seeking to compel Tollaksen to surrender his shares). The court vacated the contempt finding and associated sanctions and attorney fees, and remanded for reconsideration of Tollaksen’s motion for leave to amend his complaint.

Key Takeaways

  • Under Illinois law, corporate buy-sell agreement options must be exercised in strict conformity with their terms within the specified time period — substantial compliance is insufficient to trigger the option.
  • Where an option holder fails to strictly comply with exercise requirements, the option lapses and the holder cannot obtain specific performance compelling the other party to surrender shares.
  • Contempt findings and fee sanctions that are predicated on an erroneous grant of summary judgment will be vacated when the underlying judgment is reversed.

Why It Matters

This decision is significant for Illinois business practitioners who draft and litigate buy-sell agreements. The strict-compliance requirement for option exercises means that even minor deviations from contractual procedures — including timing requirements — can result in the complete loss of repurchase rights. For closely held corporations, this underscores the critical importance of precisely following buy-sell agreement procedures when a triggering event occurs. The 30-day clock is not merely aspirational; failure to act within the specified period can permanently extinguish the corporation’s right to repurchase a departing shareholder’s interest.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top