Trinsey v. Cooper Realty — First District affirmed the county court without a written opinion

Case
Nathaniel Trinsey v. Cooper Realty and Rowena Banton Wewer
Court
Florida First District Court of Appeal
Judge
Roberts; Winokur; Treadwell
Date Decided
September 4, 2026
Docket No.
1D2025-2707
Topics
Appeals, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Nathaniel Trinsey appealed from a decision of the County Court for Alachua County, where Judge Jonathan David Ramsey presided. The appellees were Cooper Realty and Rowena Banton Wewer.

Trinsey represented himself on appeal. The opinion does not describe the underlying dispute, the county court’s ruling, the issues raised, or the parties’ arguments.

The Court’s Holding

The First District Court of Appeal affirmed the county court’s decision in a per curiam opinion. Judges Roberts, Winokur, and Treadwell concurred.

The court provided no reasoning or discussion of the merits. The opinion states only that the judgment was affirmed and notes that the decision was not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331.

Key Takeaways

  • The First District affirmed the Alachua County Court’s decision.
  • The three-judge panel consisted of Judges Roberts, Winokur, and Treadwell.
  • Because the court issued an unexplained per curiam affirmance, the opinion announces no legal rule or rationale.

Why It Matters

The decision ends the appeal in the appellees’ favor, subject to any timely and authorized post-decision motion. Its broader significance is limited because the court did not identify the issues presented or explain why affirmance was warranted.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top