Ragan v. State — First District affirmed without a written explanation

Case
Joseph Ragan v. State of Florida
Court
Florida First District Court of Appeal
Judge
Lewis; M.K. THOMAS (Rick Scott, 2016); Treadwell
Date Decided
September 4, 2026
Docket No.
1D2026-0212
Topics
Criminal Appeals; Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Joseph Ragan, proceeding without counsel, appealed from a decision of the Circuit Court for Leon County. Circuit Judge Tiffany M. Baker-Carper entered the decision under review.

The First District’s opinion does not describe the underlying charges, the procedural history, the issues Ragan raised, or the State’s arguments.

The Court’s Holding

The First District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision in a per curiam opinion.

The court supplied no reasoning or legal analysis and did not identify any particular ground for affirmance. Judges Lewis, M.K. Thomas, and Treadwell concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The circuit court’s decision remains in place.
  • The appellate court issued a per curiam affirmance without explaining its reasoning.
  • The opinion was not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331.

Why It Matters

The ruling resolves Ragan’s appeal in the State’s favor but provides no written guidance about the underlying legal issues. Because the court did not disclose the facts, arguments, or rationale, the opinion’s significance is limited to the disposition of this case.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top