Woulard v. State — affirmed the circuit court’s ruling without explanation

Case
Dametris S. Woulard v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Makar; Wallis; Kilbane
Date Decided
September 3, 2026
Docket No.
5D2026-0701
Topics
Criminal Appeals; Rule 3.850; Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Dametris S. Woulard appealed a ruling of the Circuit Court for Volusia County in a proceeding identified as a Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 appeal. Circuit Judge Karen Adams Foxman handled the lower-court matter.

Woulard was represented on appeal by Peter Lombardo of the Law Office of Peter Lombardo. The State of Florida made no appearance.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s ruling.

The per curiam opinion provided no reasoning and did not describe the ruling under review. Judges Makar, Wallis, and Kilbane concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The Fifth District affirmed the circuit court’s ruling.
  • The appeal arose from a Rule 3.850 proceeding.
  • The opinion did not explain the basis for the affirmance or identify the specific ruling affirmed.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the circuit court’s ruling in place, but its one-word disposition supplies no analysis or precedential guidance concerning the issues raised in the appeal.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top