Wilson v. Teape — Fifth District affirmed without a written opinion

Case
Bernard Wilson v. Monique Teape
Court
Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Makar; Lambert; Kilbane
Date Decided
September 8, 2026
Docket No.
5D2026-0287
Topics
Appellate Procedure; Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Bernard Wilson appealed from a judgment or order of the Circuit Court for Flagler County in lower-tribunal case number 2025-DR-000769. Circuit Judge Christopher A. France presided below.

Wilson and appellee Monique Teape both represented themselves. The appellate opinion does not describe the underlying dispute, the ruling under review, the arguments raised on appeal, or the relevant facts.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision in a per curiam disposition. Judges Makar, Lambert, and Kilbane concurred.

The court provided no written reasoning and announced no express rule of law. The disposition states only that the lower court’s decision is affirmed.

Key Takeaways

  • The Fifth District left the circuit court’s ruling in place.
  • The court issued a per curiam affirmance without explaining its reasoning.
  • The opinion does not identify the issues presented or the factual basis of the appeal.

Why It Matters

The decision resolves this appeal in Teape’s favor by preserving the result reached in the circuit court. Because the court supplied no analysis, the opinion offers no guidance about how the Fifth District would decide similar legal issues in a future case.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top