Davis — Florida’s Second District affirmed the circuit court’s ruling without explanation

Case
Theodore Davis, Jr. v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Second District Court of Appeal
Judge
Northcutt; Khouzam; Smith
Date Decided
September 9, 2026
Docket No.
2D2024-2724
Topics
Criminal Appeals, Summary Affirmance, Postconviction Procedure
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Theodore Davis, Jr. appealed a ruling of the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County, where Judge G. Gregory Green presided. The appellate proceeding was brought pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2).

The Second District’s opinion does not describe Davis’s underlying conviction, the circuit court ruling under review, the claims Davis raised, or the State’s arguments.

The Court’s Holding

In a per curiam decision, the Florida Second District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s ruling.

The court provided no reasoning or discussion of the issues. Judges Northcutt, Khouzam, and Smith concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The Second District affirmed the circuit court’s ruling.
  • The appeal proceeded under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2).
  • The per curiam opinion did not explain the facts, issues, or basis for affirmance.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the circuit court’s ruling in place but supplies no written analysis for attorneys or lower courts to apply in other cases.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top