Von DeBaron v. Burke — Fifth District affirmed without a written explanation

Case
Elijah Jesse Von DeBaron v. Vanessa Christine Burke
Court
Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Lambert; Edwards; Soud
Date Decided
September 10, 2026
Docket No.
5D2025-3042
Topics
Appeals, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Elijah Jesse Von DeBaron appealed from a decision of the Circuit Court for Volusia County, where Judge Sandra C. Upchurch presided. The appellate opinion identifies the lower-tribunal case as 2019-11808-FMDL but does not describe the dispute, the ruling under review, or the arguments raised on appeal.

Von DeBaron represented himself on appeal. Vanessa Christine Burke made no appearance.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision in a per curiam disposition.

The court provided no analysis or explanation for its ruling. Judges Lambert, Edwards, and Soud concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The Fifth District left the circuit court’s ruling in place.
  • The decision was issued as an unexplained per curiam affirmance.
  • The opinion establishes no stated reasoning beyond the result.

Why It Matters

The decision ends the appeal in Burke’s favor unless altered through a timely and authorized motion under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331. Because the court did not provide reasoning or discuss the underlying issues, the opinion offers no substantive guidance about the dispute.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top