Republican National Committee v. Wetzel — Fifth Circuit affirmed Mississippi election ruling after Supreme Court remand

Case
Republican National Committee; Mississippi Republican Party; James Perry; Matthew Lamb v. Justin Wetzel, in his official capacity as Clerk and Registrar of the Circuit Court of Harrison County, et al.; Libertarian Party of Mississippi v. Justin Wetzel, et al.
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Judge
James C. Ho (Donald Trump, 2017); Stuart Kyle Duncan (Donald Trump, 2018); Andrew S. Oldham (Donald Trump, 2018)
Date Decided
September 9, 2026
Docket No.
24-60395
Topics
Election Law; Supreme Court Remand; Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

The Republican National Committee, the Mississippi Republican Party, two individuals, and the Libertarian Party of Mississippi brought actions against Mississippi election officials, including Harrison County Clerk and Registrar Justin Wetzel, members of the Harrison County Election Commission, and Secretary of State Michael Watson. Vet Voice Foundation and the Mississippi Alliance for Retired Americans participated as intervenor defendants.

The consolidated appeal arose from two cases in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi, Nos. 1:24-CV-25 and 1:24-CV-37. The matter returned to the Fifth Circuit on remand from the U.S. Supreme Court.

The Court’s Holding

In a brief, unpublished per curiam opinion, the Fifth Circuit affirmed the district court’s judgment.

The panel stated that affirmance was required “in light of” the Supreme Court’s decision in Watson v. RNC, 146 S. Ct. 2165 (2026). The Fifth Circuit offered no additional reasoning or independent analysis.

Key Takeaways

  • The Fifth Circuit affirmed the district court after the case returned from the Supreme Court.
  • The disposition rested expressly on Watson v. RNC, 146 S. Ct. 2165 (2026).
  • The per curiam opinion was designated as unpublished under Fifth Circuit Rule 47.5.

Why It Matters

The ruling leaves the district court’s judgment intact and applies the Supreme Court’s intervening decision to the consolidated Mississippi election litigation. Because the panel supplied no further analysis, the substantive governing rule must be drawn from Watson v. RNC rather than this unpublished remand opinion.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top