Khan v. Bloom — Fourth District affirmed without a written explanation

Case
Saeed A. Khan, M.D. v. Lisa Bloom, Esq., et al.
Court
Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal
Judge
GERBER, C.J.; LOTT, J.; WEISS, MARLON JAY, Associate Judge
Date Decided
September 10, 2026
Docket No.
4D2025-3030
Topics
Appeals, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Saeed A. Khan, M.D., appealed from a ruling of the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in Palm Beach County. Circuit Judge Bradley G. Harper presided over the underlying case, docketed as No. 502024CA006112XXXAMB.

The Fourth District’s opinion does not describe the underlying dispute, the challenged ruling, the parties’ arguments, or the applicable law.

The Court’s Holding

The Fourth District affirmed the circuit court’s ruling in a per curiam decision.

The court provided no reasoning or other substantive explanation for its disposition. The opinion was designated nonfinal until disposition of any timely filed motion for rehearing.

Key Takeaways

  • The circuit court’s ruling was affirmed.
  • The appellate court issued a per curiam affirmance without a written explanation.
  • The opinion identifies Chief Judge Gerber, Judge Lott, and Associate Judge Marlon Jay Weiss as the participating panel.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the circuit court’s ruling in place but supplies no factual or legal analysis explaining the result. Its practical significance therefore lies in the affirmance itself rather than in any announced rule of law.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top