Ofstein v. Ofstein — Fourth District affirmed without a written explanation

Case
Lucy Pereira Ofstein v. James Dominic Ofstein
Court
Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Gerber, C.J. (Charlie Crist, 2009); Shaw, J. (Ron DeSantis, 2025); Lott, J. (Ron DeSantis, 2025)
Date Decided
September 10, 2026
Docket No.
4D2026-0268
Topics
Appeals, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Lucy Pereira Ofstein, representing herself, appealed from an unidentified ruling of the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit in Broward County. Circuit Judge Christopher Wigand presided below.

James Dominic Ofstein appeared through counsel. The appellate opinion does not describe the parties’ dispute, the ruling under review, the arguments on appeal, or the circuit court’s reasoning.

The Court’s Holding

The Fourth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s ruling in a per curiam decision.

The court provided no analysis or explanation for its disposition. Chief Judge Gerber and Judges Shaw and Lott concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The Fourth District affirmed the unidentified circuit-court ruling.
  • The decision contains no discussion of the facts, legal issues, or reasoning.
  • The opinion was not final until disposition of any timely filed motion for rehearing.

Why It Matters

The decision resolves the appeal in the appellee’s favor but offers no written reasoning for attorneys to apply in other cases. Because the opinion does not identify the underlying ruling or issues presented, no broader substantive holding can reliably be drawn from it.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top