Phillips v. Bembry — Attorney-fee ruling affirmed in part; remaining challenges dismissed for lack of standing

Case
In re: Guardianship of J.B.B., an incapacitated person; Tracy Phillips v. Lanette Bembry, as plenary guardian of J.B.B., and Troy Buzzo
Court
Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Traver, C.J.; Nardella, J.; Mize, J.
Date Decided
September 10, 2026
Docket No.
6D2026-0203
Topics
Guardianship; Attorney fees; Standing; Interested person
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Tracy Phillips, the daughter of J.B.B., an incapacitated person, appealed from proceedings concerning an attorney-fee award in J.B.B.’s guardianship case. Lanette Bembry was J.B.B.’s plenary guardian, and Troy Buzzo was an appellee.

At the attorney-fee hearing, the Polk County Circuit Court determined that Phillips was not an interested person. Phillips challenged that ruling and raised other issues concerning the fee award.

The Court’s Holding

The Sixth District affirmed the determination that Phillips was not an interested person for purposes of the attorney-fee hearing. The court relied on Florida authority explaining that next-of-kin status alone does not establish interested-person status and that a person must reasonably be expected to be affected by the particular proceeding.

The court also noted the need to prevent attorney-fee petitions from being subjected to endless challenges by persons whose only interest is maximizing a potential inheritance. As to Phillips’s remaining challenges to the attorney-fee award, the court dismissed the appeal for lack of standing.

Key Takeaways

  • Being an incapacitated person’s daughter, without more, did not make Phillips an interested person in the fee hearing.
  • Interested-person status depends on whether the person may reasonably be expected to be affected by the specific proceeding.
  • The remaining appellate challenges to the fee award were dismissed for lack of standing.

Why It Matters

The decision reinforces that family members and potential heirs do not automatically have standing to litigate attorney fees in guardianship proceedings. A challenger must show a direct, proceeding-specific interest rather than a generalized concern about the estate or a potential inheritance.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top