Barman v. USA — Ninth Circuit holds USCIS NM-1 denials are unreviewable

Case
Sukesh Chandra Barman v. United States of America; Rebecca Maliuwelur
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Judge
N. Randy Smith (George W. Bush, 2007); Eric D. Miller (Donald Trump, 2019); Anthony D. Johnstone (Joe Biden, 2023)
Date Decided
September 14, 2026
Docket No.
24-464
Topics
Immigration; NM-1 status; Judicial review; Subject-matter jurisdiction
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Congress created NM-1 status through the Northern Mariana Islands Long-Term Legal Residents Relief Act for certain long-term residents of the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands. The statute authorizes the Secretary of Homeland Security and the Attorney General to adjudicate applications, while providing that no court has jurisdiction to review any decision on such an application or other action implementing the program.

Sukesh Chandra Barman applied to USCIS for NM-1 status in 2020. USCIS’s Guam Field Office denied the application, finding that Barman had not continuously and lawfully resided in the Commonwealth from November 28, 2009, through June 25, 2019. After USCIS denied reconsideration, Barman sued for a declaration that he met the eligibility criteria and an injunction requiring approval. The district court dismissed for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.

The Court’s Holding

The Ninth Circuit affirmed. It held that 48 U.S.C. § 1806(e)(6)(D) bars judicial review of USCIS decisions denying NM-1 status, even though the provision refers to decisions of the Secretary of Homeland Security or the Attorney General rather than USCIS by name.

USCIS acted under authority validly delegated by the Secretary, and a delegate’s decision is functionally a decision of the delegator. Congress enacted the review bar against the backdrop of the Secretary’s longstanding delegation of immigration-benefit adjudications to USCIS. The court also found support in cases applying a similar immigration review bar to USCIS decisions and concluded that the presumption favoring reviewability did not apply because the statute was clear.

Key Takeaways

  • A USCIS NM-1 denial is a decision of the Secretary of Homeland Security for purposes of § 1806(e)(6)(D).
  • The NM-1 statute strips federal courts of jurisdiction to review those denials.
  • Delegation to USCIS does not preserve judicial review where Congress barred review of the Secretary’s decisions.

Why It Matters

The decision closes a proposed route to district-court review of NM-1 eligibility determinations made by USCIS. For NM-1 applicants, the statutory jurisdictional bar applies even when the operative decision is issued by USCIS rather than personally by the Secretary.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top