Clark v. State of Florida — First District affirmed without a written opinion

Case
Charles J. Clark v. State of Florida
Court
Florida First District Court of Appeal
Judge
Bilbrey; Treadwell; Neff
Date Decided
September 14, 2026
Docket No.
1D2025-2318
Topics
Appellate Procedure, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Charles J. Clark, proceeding without counsel, appealed from the Circuit Court for Madison County. Circuit Judge E. Bailey Browning, III, entered the decision under review.

The First District’s opinion does not describe the underlying dispute, the ruling being challenged, the arguments raised on appeal, or the nature of the case.

The Court’s Holding

The First District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision in a per curiam disposition.

The court provided no reasoning or discussion of the issues. Judges Bilbrey, Treadwell, and Neff concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The circuit court’s decision was affirmed.
  • The appellate court issued no written analysis explaining its disposition.
  • The opinion does not identify the underlying claims, issues, or type of proceeding.

Why It Matters

The disposition leaves the circuit court’s ruling intact but supplies no substantive reasoning for attorneys to apply in other cases.

The decision was designated not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top