Velasco v. Alvarado-Damaso — affirmed the circuit court without a written explanation

Case
Danilo Velasco and Victor Rondon v. Daniel Alvarado-Damaso and Hwy Motors, LLC
Court
Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Edwards; Soud; Boatwright
Date Decided
September 15, 2026
Docket No.
5D2025-2157
Topics
Civil Appeal; Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Danilo Velasco and Victor Rondon appealed a decision of the Circuit Court for Marion County in their case against Daniel Alvarado-Damaso and Hwy Motors, LLC.

The opinion identifies Circuit Judge Steven G. Rogers as the trial judge but provides no facts, procedural history, issues presented, or description of the circuit court’s ruling.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision.

The court issued a per curiam affirmance without a written explanation. Accordingly, the opinion states no legal reasoning and announces no rule beyond the disposition of this appeal.

Key Takeaways

  • The Fifth District affirmed the circuit court’s decision.
  • Judges Edwards, Soud, and Boatwright concurred.
  • The opinion does not disclose the underlying facts, appellate arguments, or grounds for affirmance.

Why It Matters

The ruling leaves the circuit court’s decision in place as between these parties. Because the appellate court supplied no reasoning, the opinion offers no substantive guidance on the legal issues that may have been presented.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top