Ragland v. Ragland — Court of Appeal denied the supervisory writ application

Case
Robert James Ragland v. Katherine Diamond Ragland
Court
Louisiana Court of Appeal, First Circuit
Judge
Theriot; Penzato; Edwards
Date Decided
September 14, 2026
Docket No.
2026 CW 0868
Topics
Family Law; Supervisory Writs; Appellate Procedure
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Katherine Diamond Ragland applied for supervisory writs in a family-court matter involving Robert James Ragland.

The application arose from proceedings in the Family Court for the Parish of East Baton Rouge, case number 209479. The brief disposition does not identify the ruling challenged or describe the underlying dispute.

The Court’s Holding

The Louisiana Court of Appeal, First Circuit, denied the writ application.

The court provided no reasoning and did not address the merits of the underlying family-court dispute.

Key Takeaways

  • The First Circuit denied Katherine Diamond Ragland’s application for supervisory writs.
  • The disposition contains no explanation for the denial.
  • The opinion does not identify the challenged ruling or the relief sought beyond supervisory review.

Why It Matters

The decision is a summary writ denial limited to the application before the court. Because the court supplied no analysis or details about the challenged ruling, the disposition should not be read as announcing a broader rule of law.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top