Myrick v. State — Florida appeals court affirmed without a written explanation

Case
Craig Allen Myrick v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Second District Court of Appeal
Judge
Black; Sleet; Atkinson
Date Decided
September 16, 2026
Docket No.
2D2025-2410
Topics
Criminal Appeal, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Craig Allen Myrick, representing himself, appealed from a decision of the Circuit Court for Pinellas County. Circuit Judge Rebecca Hamilton presided over the matter below.

The appellate opinion does not describe the underlying charges, procedural history, issues raised, or arguments presented. The State was represented by the Florida Attorney General’s Office.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Second District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision.

The court issued a per curiam affirmance without explaining its reasoning. Judges Black, Sleet, and Atkinson concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The circuit court’s decision remains in effect.
  • The appellate court provided no written analysis of the issues raised.
  • The opinion does not establish a stated rule of law or disclose the factual basis for the appeal.

Why It Matters

The decision resolves Myrick’s appeal in the State’s favor but offers no reasoning for attorneys or lower courts to apply in other cases. Because the opinion contains no factual or legal analysis, its broader significance cannot be determined from the text alone.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top