Gaeto v. Auto Dealership V — Second District affirmed the county court’s decision without explanation

Case
Anthony Gaeto v. Auto Dealership V, LLC d/b/a Mercedes-Benz of Wesley Chapel
Court
Florida Second District Court of Appeal
Judge
Black; Sleet; Atkinson
Date Decided
September 16, 2026
Docket No.
2D2025-2675
Topics
Appeals, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Anthony Gaeto appealed a decision of the County Court for Pasco County in litigation against Auto Dealership V, LLC, doing business as Mercedes-Benz of Wesley Chapel. County Judge Kenneth Compton presided over the lower-court proceeding.

Gaeto represented himself on appeal. The dealership was represented by counsel. The appellate opinion does not describe the underlying dispute, the county court’s ruling, or the arguments raised on appeal.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Second District Court of Appeal affirmed the county court’s decision in a per curiam opinion.

The court provided no reasoning or discussion of the facts or legal issues. Judges Black, Sleet, and Atkinson concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The Second District left the county court’s decision in place.
  • The affirmance was issued per curiam without a written explanation.
  • The opinion establishes no stated rationale concerning the underlying dispute.

Why It Matters

The decision ends this appeal with the lower court’s ruling intact, but its one-word disposition offers practitioners no explanation of the governing law or the appellate court’s reasoning.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top