McKinley v. State — affirmed without a written opinion

Case
Karron Lee McKinley v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Nardella; Brownlee; Kamoutsas
Date Decided
September 15, 2026
Docket No.
6D2025-1738
Topics
Criminal Appeal; Per Curiam Affirmance; Appellate Procedure
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Karron Lee McKinley appealed from a decision of the Circuit Court for Polk County in lower-tribunal case number 2023-CF-002941. Circuit Judge Jalal A. Harb presided below.

The Sixth District Court of Appeal’s opinion does not describe the underlying charges, facts, procedural history, or arguments raised on appeal. McKinley was represented by the Public Defender’s Office; the State made no appearance.

The Court’s Holding

The Sixth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision in a per curiam disposition.

The court provided no written reasoning or discussion of the issues presented. Judges Nardella, Brownlee, and Kamoutsas concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The circuit court’s decision was affirmed.
  • The appellate court issued a per curiam affirmance without explaining its reasoning.
  • The opinion does not identify the underlying facts, charges, or appellate issues.

Why It Matters

The ruling leaves the circuit court’s decision in place but supplies no legal analysis for attorneys to apply in other cases. Its significance is therefore principally case-specific.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top