Morris v. State — Florida appeals court affirmed without a written explanation

Case
Arealeus Morris v. State of Florida
Court
Florida First District Court of Appeal
Judge
Osterhaus, C.J.; Winokur, J.; Treadwell, J.
Date Decided
September 17, 2026
Docket No.
1D2025-2199
Topics
Criminal Appeal; Per Curiam Affirmance; Florida Appellate Procedure
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Arealeus Morris, representing himself, appealed from a decision of the Circuit Court for Alachua County. Circuit Judge James M. Colaw entered the ruling under review.

The First District Court of Appeal’s opinion does not describe the underlying charges, the circuit court’s ruling, the arguments raised on appeal, or the relevant facts.

The Court’s Holding

The First District affirmed the circuit court’s decision in a per curiam opinion.

The court provided no reasoning or legal analysis, so the opinion establishes only that the judgment or order under review was left in place. The decision was not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331.

Key Takeaways

  • The First District affirmed the circuit court’s ruling.
  • The decision was per curiam and contained no explanation of the court’s reasoning.
  • The opinion does not disclose the underlying facts, issues, or arguments.

Why It Matters

The ruling ends the appeal in the State’s favor unless further review or an authorized post-decision motion changes the result. Because the court supplied no reasoning, the opinion offers no substantive guidance on the legal issues Morris raised.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top