Patel v. Florida DBPR — affirmed the agency’s decision without explanation

Case
Chirag Patel v. State of Florida, Department of Business and Professional Regulation, Division of Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco
Court
Florida First District Court of Appeal
Judge
Roberts, J.; Winokur, J.; Treadwell, J.
Date Decided
September 17, 2026
Docket No.
1D2025-2068
Topics
Administrative Appeal; Alcohol Regulation; Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Chirag Patel appealed a decision of the Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation, Division of Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco. The appeal came from the agency under Director Jerome Worley.

The opinion does not describe the underlying dispute, the agency’s ruling, the arguments raised on appeal, or the applicable legal standards.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida First District Court of Appeal affirmed the agency’s decision.

The court issued a per curiam decision consisting solely of the word “AFFIRMED.” It provided no reasoning and announced no express rule of law.

Key Takeaways

  • The agency’s decision remains in effect.
  • Judges Roberts, Winokur, and Treadwell concurred in the disposition.
  • The opinion supplies no factual or legal analysis from which to identify the court’s rationale.

Why It Matters

The decision resolves Patel’s appeal in the agency’s favor but offers no written guidance on Florida alcohol-regulation law or administrative appellate review.

Because the court did not explain its reasoning, the opinion should not be read as deciding issues beyond the affirmance itself.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top