Boldry — First District affirmed without a written explanation

Case
Elizabeth Boldry v. State of Florida
Court
Florida First District Court of Appeal
Judge
Osterhaus, C.J.; Bilbrey, J.; Neff, J.
Date Decided
September 17, 2026
Docket No.
1D2026-0774
Topics
Appeal; Per Curiam; Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Elizabeth Boldry appealed from a decision of the Circuit Court for Baker County, where Judge James M. Colaw presided. Boldry represented herself on appeal, while the State of Florida was represented by the Attorney General’s office.

The First District’s opinion does not describe the underlying dispute, the circuit court’s ruling, the issues raised on appeal, or the parties’ arguments.

The Court’s Holding

The First District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision. The court issued its ruling per curiam, with Chief Judge Osterhaus and Judges Bilbrey and Neff concurring.

The opinion provides no legal analysis or explanation for the affirmance. It also states that the decision is not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331.

Key Takeaways

  • The circuit court’s decision was affirmed.
  • The appellate court gave no reasons for its disposition.
  • The opinion does not identify the underlying facts, claims, or appellate issues.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the circuit court’s ruling in place but supplies no written reasoning for attorneys or lower courts to apply in other cases. Because the opinion omits the underlying facts and legal issues, no broader substantive holding can be drawn from it.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top