Pierre — Fourth DCA affirmed the county court without a written explanation

Case
Nadia Pierre v. SS Floor Coatings, LLC, d/b/a Performance Floors & Coating of Palm Beach
Court
Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Gerber, C.J. (Charlie Crist, 2009); Shepherd, J. (Ron DeSantis, 2025); Lott, J. (Ron DeSantis, 2025)
Date Decided
September 17, 2026
Docket No.
4D2025-1607
Topics
Per Curiam Affirmance, Civil Appeal
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Nadia Pierre appealed from a decision of the County Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit in St. Lucie County. County Judge Daryl Isenhower presided over the underlying matter, docketed as case number 562024SC003407AXXXHC.

The appellee was SS Floor Coatings, LLC, doing business as Performance Floors & Coating of Palm Beach. The appellate opinion does not describe the parties’ dispute, the county court’s ruling, the arguments on appeal, or the relief Pierre sought.

The Court’s Holding

The Fourth District Court of Appeal affirmed the county court’s decision in a per curiam disposition. Chief Judge Gerber and Judges Shepherd and Lott concurred.

The court provided no written reasoning or discussion of the governing law. The opinion therefore establishes only that the judgment under review was affirmed; it does not identify a legal issue resolved by the panel or disclose the grounds for affirmance.

Key Takeaways

  • The Fourth District affirmed the county court’s decision.
  • The disposition was per curiam and contained no explanatory analysis.
  • The opinion does not reveal the underlying facts, appellate arguments, or basis for the court’s ruling.

Why It Matters

The ruling leaves the county court’s decision in place, but its lack of reasoning limits what attorneys can draw from it about the merits or governing legal principles. The opinion also states that it is not final until disposition of any timely filed motion for rehearing.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top