Zingale v. AJX Mortgage Trust I — Fourth District affirmed without a written opinion

Case
John C. Zingale, et al. v. AJX Mortgage Trust I, a Delaware Trust, Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB, Trustee
Court
Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Gerber, C.J. (Charlie Crist, 2009); Shaw, J. (Ron DeSantis, 2025); Lott, J. (Ron DeSantis, 2025)
Date Decided
September 17, 2026
Docket No.
4D2025-1552
Topics
Mortgage litigation; Appeals; Per curiam affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

John C. Zingale and others appealed from a judgment or order of the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit in Broward County in litigation involving AJX Mortgage Trust I and Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB, as trustee. Circuit Judge Gary Michael Farmer, Jr. presided below.

The Fourth District’s opinion does not describe the underlying dispute, the trial court’s ruling, the issues raised on appeal, or the parties’ arguments. Zingale appeared pro se, while AJX Mortgage Trust I was represented by counsel.

The Court’s Holding

The Fourth District affirmed the circuit court’s decision in a per curiam opinion. Chief Judge Gerber and Judges Shaw and Lott concurred.

Because the court provided no reasoning or discussion of the issues, the opinion establishes only that the challenged ruling was affirmed. It does not announce a legal rule or explain the basis for the affirmance.

Key Takeaways

  • The Fourth District affirmed the Broward County circuit court’s ruling.
  • The decision was a per curiam affirmance consisting solely of “Affirmed.”
  • The opinion supplies no facts, legal analysis, or explanation of the grounds for affirmance.

Why It Matters

The decision ends the appeal in the appellee’s favor, subject to disposition of any timely motion for rehearing. Its significance beyond the parties is limited because the court issued no written analysis identifying the questions presented or the law applied.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top