Johnson — affirmed the criminal judgment without a written opinion

Case
Haven Demetrice Johnson v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Levine; Conner; Shepherd
Date Decided
September 17, 2026
Docket No.
4D2026-1452
Topics
Criminal Appeals; Summary Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Haven Demetrice Johnson appealed from a proceeding in the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit in St. Lucie County. Circuit Judge Michael James Linn presided below in case number 562024CF002372AXXXSL.

The Fourth District’s opinion provides no facts, identifies no appellate issues, and describes neither the challenged ruling nor Johnson’s arguments. Johnson was represented on appeal by the public defender’s office; no appearance was required for the State.

The Court’s Holding

The Fourth District affirmed the circuit court’s judgment in a per curiam decision. Judges Levine, Conner, and Shepherd concurred.

Because the court issued only a one-word disposition—“Affirmed”—it supplied no reasoning and announced no express rule of law. The opinion therefore does not reveal which arguments the court considered or the grounds supporting affirmance.

Key Takeaways

  • The Fourth District affirmed the judgment under review.
  • The court issued a per curiam affirmance without a written explanation.
  • The decision was not final until disposition of any timely filed motion for rehearing.

Why It Matters

The ruling leaves the circuit court’s judgment intact, subject to any timely rehearing proceedings. Because the appellate court provided no factual discussion or legal analysis, the opinion offers no articulated guidance on the underlying criminal-law issues.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top