Davis v. State — Fourth District affirmed denial of a Rule 3.800 motion

Case
Breon T. Davis v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Ciklin; Klingensmith; Lott
Date Decided
September 17, 2026
Docket No.
4D2026-2091
Topics
Criminal Procedure, Sentencing, Rule 3.800
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Breon T. Davis filed a motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800 in three criminal cases in the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit in Broward County. Circuit Judge Michael Usan denied the motion.

Davis, proceeding without counsel, appealed the denial to Florida’s Fourth District Court of Appeal. The State was not required to appear.

The Court’s Holding

The Fourth District affirmed the order denying Davis’s Rule 3.800 motion.

The per curiam opinion provided no analysis or explanation for the affirmance. Judges Ciklin, Klingensmith, and Lott concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The order denying Davis’s Rule 3.800 motion remains in place.
  • The appellate court affirmed without a written discussion of Davis’s arguments or the governing law.
  • The decision was not final until disposition of any timely filed motion for rehearing.

Why It Matters

Because the opinion consists only of an affirmance and supplies no reasoning, it resolves Davis’s appeal but offers no substantive guidance about Rule 3.800 or the merits of his motion.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top