Lewis v. Hudson National Golf Club — affirmed the county court without explanation

Case
Sam Lewis v. Hudson National Golf Club
Court
Florida Second District Court of Appeal
Judge
Silberman; Kelly; Smith
Date Decided
September 18, 2026
Docket No.
2D2025-3214
Topics
Appeals, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Sam Lewis appealed from a decision of the County Court for Hillsborough County, where Judge James Giardina presided. Lewis represented himself on appeal, while Hudson National Golf Club was represented by counsel.

The appellate opinion does not describe the underlying dispute, the county court’s ruling, the issues Lewis raised, or the parties’ arguments.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Second District Court of Appeal affirmed the county court’s decision.

The court issued a per curiam affirmance without a written explanation, so the opinion states no legal reasoning and establishes no express rule beyond leaving the challenged judgment in place.

Key Takeaways

  • The county court’s judgment remains in effect.
  • The appellate court provided no explanation for its decision.
  • Judges Silberman, Kelly, and Smith concurred in the disposition.

Why It Matters

The decision resolves this appeal in Hudson National Golf Club’s favor but offers no written analysis for attorneys or lower courts to apply in other cases.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top