Jordan — Florida appeals court affirmed without a written explanation

Case
Trevon Jovonta Jordan v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Second District Court of Appeal
Judge
LaROSE; ATKINSON; SMITH
Date Decided
September 18, 2026
Docket No.
2D2025-0830
Topics
Criminal Appeals, Postconviction Procedure, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Trevon Jovonta Jordan appealed from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County, where Judge Keith Meyer presided.

The appeal proceeded under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2). The opinion does not describe Jordan’s claims, the circuit court’s ruling, or the underlying facts.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Second District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision.

The court issued a per curiam affirmance without a written explanation. Judges LaRose, Atkinson, and Smith concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The Second District affirmed the circuit court’s ruling.
  • The decision provides no reasoning or discussion of Jordan’s claims.
  • The appeal was handled under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2).

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the circuit court’s ruling intact but supplies no written analysis for attorneys or lower courts to apply in other cases.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top