Cannon v. State — Florida appellate court affirmed without a written explanation

Case
Gary S. Cannon v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Second District Court of Appeal
Judge
Silberman; Kelly; Smith
Date Decided
September 18, 2026
Docket No.
2D2025-1252
Topics
Criminal Appeal, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Gary S. Cannon appealed from a judgment or order of the Circuit Court for Pasco County, where Judge Lynn Tepper presided.

The appellate opinion does not identify the charges, describe the underlying facts, state the issues Cannon raised, or explain the circuit court’s ruling.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Second District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision.

The court issued a per curiam affirmance without a written explanation. Judges Silberman, Kelly, and Smith concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The circuit court’s decision remains in effect.
  • The appellate court provided no reasoning or discussion of the issues presented.
  • The opinion identifies Silberman, Kelly, and Smith as the participating judges.

Why It Matters

Because the decision contains only an unexplained affirmance, it resolves Cannon’s appeal but offers no substantive guidance about the governing law or the court’s reasoning.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top