Barese v. State — Florida appellate court affirmed without a written opinion

Case
Salvatore Louis Barese v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Second District Court of Appeal
Judge
Northcutt; Khouzam; Guard
Date Decided
September 18, 2026
Docket No.
2D2025-1824
Topics
Criminal Appeal; Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Salvatore Louis Barese appealed from proceedings in the Circuit Court for Pinellas County before Judges Christopher M. LaBruzzo and Chris Helinger. The opinion does not describe the underlying charges, rulings, facts, or issues raised on appeal.

Barese was represented by the Public Defender’s Office. The Florida Attorney General’s Office represented the State.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Second District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s judgment in a per curiam decision.

The court provided no reasoning or discussion of the appellate issues. Judges Northcutt, Khouzam, and Guard concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The circuit court’s judgment remains in effect.
  • The appellate court affirmed without a written explanation of its reasoning.
  • The opinion does not identify or resolve any legal issue in a precedential analysis.

Why It Matters

The decision ends this appeal at the Second District Court of Appeal with an affirmance, but its one-word disposition offers no guidance about the underlying facts or legal questions.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top