In re JAL Equity Corp. — Mandamus petition denied for failure to establish entitlement to relief

Case
In re JAL Equity Corp., Horizon Fulfillment, LLC, and Eran Salu
Court
Texas Fifteenth Court of Appeals
Judge
Chief Justice Brister; Justice Field; Justice Farris
Date Decided
September 17, 2026
Docket No.
15-26-00164-CV
Topics
Mandamus, Original Proceedings, Business Court
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

JAL Equity Corp., Horizon Fulfillment, LLC, and Eran Salu sought a writ of mandamus from the Texas Fifteenth Court of Appeals. The original proceeding arose from Trial Court Cause No. 25-BC03A-0013-A in Business Court Division 3A in Travis County.

The relators filed their mandamus petition on September 1, 2026. The memorandum opinion does not describe the underlying dispute, the challenged ruling, or the particular relief requested.

The Court’s Holding

The court held that the relators had not established that they were entitled to mandamus relief.

Accordingly, the court denied the petition for writ of mandamus. The per curiam memorandum opinion provided no additional analysis of the governing mandamus standards or the relators’ asserted grounds for relief.

Key Takeaways

  • The court denied mandamus relief because the relators failed to establish their entitlement to it.
  • The decision resolved an original proceeding arising from a case in Business Court Division 3A in Travis County.
  • The brief memorandum opinion did not disclose the underlying facts, the challenged trial-court action, or the specific defect in the relators’ showing.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the challenged business-court action undisturbed and underscores that parties seeking extraordinary mandamus relief must affirmatively establish their entitlement to that remedy.

Because the court supplied no factual or legal analysis beyond finding the showing insufficient, the opinion offers limited guidance for other disputes.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top