Staley v. State — affirmed the circuit court’s decision without explanation

Case
Negusse P. Staley v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Second District Court of Appeal
Judge
LUCAS, C.J.; SILBERMAN, J.; KELLY, J.
Date Decided
September 23, 2026
Docket No.
2D2025-2106
Topics
Criminal Appeals; Summary Affirmance; Pro Se Litigation
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Negusse P. Staley, proceeding without counsel, appealed a decision of the Circuit Court for Pinellas County. Circuit Judge Philip James Federico had presided over the matter below.

The appeal proceeded pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2). The brief opinion does not describe the underlying charges, the circuit court’s ruling, Staley’s arguments, or the State’s position.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Second District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision.

The per curiam opinion provides no analysis or explanation for the disposition. Chief Judge Lucas and Judges Silberman and Kelly concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The Second District affirmed the circuit court’s decision.
  • The court issued a per curiam opinion without stated reasoning.
  • The opinion does not identify the issues raised or establish a substantive legal rule.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the circuit court’s ruling in place, but its lack of factual discussion or legal analysis limits what can be drawn from it beyond the result in Staley’s case.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top