State in the Interest of J.B., M.B., T.B., and R.B. — Rehearing denied in child-welfare appeal

Case
State of Louisiana in the Interest of J.B., M.B., T.B., and R.B.
Court
Louisiana Court of Appeal, First Circuit
Judge
Page McClendon; Jennifer T. Greene; Tess Percy Stromberg
Date Decided
September 23, 2026
Docket No.
2026-CJ-0218
Topics
Juvenile Law, Child Welfare, Rehearing
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

The proceeding arose from a juvenile matter involving J.B., M.B., T.B., and R.B. in the Juvenile Court of East Baton Rouge Parish, case number 13206. The matter reached the Louisiana Court of Appeal, First Circuit, under docket number 2026-CJ-0218.

On September 3, 2026, the Louisiana Department of Children and Family Services applied for rehearing. The brief rehearing disposition does not describe the underlying facts, the issues decided in the court’s earlier ruling, or the Department’s arguments for rehearing.

The Court’s Holding

The First Circuit denied the Department of Children and Family Services’ application for rehearing. The order therefore left the court’s prior disposition in place without further substantive analysis.

Chief Judge Page McClendon indicated that she would have granted rehearing. The order provides no explanation for either the majority’s denial or Chief Judge McClendon’s position.

Key Takeaways

  • The Department of Children and Family Services did not obtain rehearing of the First Circuit’s prior decision.
  • The denial left the court’s earlier disposition undisturbed.
  • Chief Judge Page McClendon would have granted the rehearing application.

Why It Matters

The order confirms that the First Circuit declined to revisit its prior ruling in this juvenile proceeding. Because the disposition contains no factual discussion or legal reasoning, it should be understood as a case-specific rehearing denial rather than a new precedential explanation of Louisiana juvenile or child-welfare law.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top