Piyevsky v. Weissman — Third District affirmed without a written explanation

Case
Ellen Piyevsky v. Jason Weissman and Tanya Weissman
Court
Florida Third District Court of Appeal
Judge
LOGUE; LINDSEY; GOODEN
Date Decided
September 24, 2026
Docket No.
3D24-0222, 3D24-2112
Topics
Civil Appeal, Cross-Appeal, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Ellen Piyevsky appealed from a decision of the County Court for Miami-Dade County, where Judge Linda Singer Stein presided. Jason Weissman and Tanya Weissman were the appellees and cross-appellants.

The appellate opinion does not describe the underlying dispute, the county court’s ruling, the issues raised on appeal, or the parties’ arguments.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Third District Court of Appeal affirmed the county court’s decision.

The court issued a per curiam affirmance without explaining its reasoning or separately addressing the appeal and cross-appeal.

Key Takeaways

  • The county court’s decision was affirmed.
  • The disposition resolved an appeal and a cross-appeal.
  • The opinion provides no factual discussion, legal analysis, or articulated rule of law.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the county court’s ruling in place, but the opinion’s one-word disposition supplies no reasoning for attorneys to apply in other cases.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top