Barnhill v. State — affirmed the judgment without a written explanation

Case
Dustin Wade Barnhill v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Jay, C.J.; Wallis, J.; MacIver, J.
Date Decided
September 22, 2026
Docket No.
5D2024-2847
Topics
Criminal Appeal; Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Dustin Wade Barnhill appealed from a judgment of the Circuit Court for Duval County. Circuit Judge Lindsay L. Tygart presided over the lower-court proceeding.

The Fifth District Court of Appeal’s opinion does not describe the underlying facts, the charges, the arguments raised on appeal, or the circuit court’s reasoning.

The Court’s Holding

The Fifth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s judgment.

The court issued a per curiam affirmance without a written explanation. Chief Judge Jay and Judges Wallis and MacIver concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The circuit court’s judgment remains in place.
  • The appellate court provided no reasoning or discussion of the issues presented.
  • The opinion was not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331.

Why It Matters

Because the decision contains no factual discussion or legal analysis, it establishes no articulated rule for application in other cases. Its immediate significance is that Barnhill did not obtain reversal or other relief from the Fifth District.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top