Hernandez v. State — Florida appeals court affirmed without a written explanation

Case
Jose Hernandez v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Second District Court of Appeal
Judge
Northcutt; Khouzam; Guard
Date Decided
September 23, 2026
Docket No.
2D2025-2097
Topics
Appeals, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Jose Hernandez appealed from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County, where Judge Pat E. Siracusa presided. The opinion does not describe the underlying facts, claims, or ruling challenged on appeal.

Hernandez was represented on appeal by the Public Defender’s Office. The State of Florida was represented by the Attorney General’s Office.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Second District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s ruling. The decision was issued per curiam, with Judges Northcutt, Khouzam, and Guard concurring.

The opinion provides no reasoning and does not identify the specific grounds raised by Hernandez or the nature of the ruling affirmed.

Key Takeaways

  • The appellate court affirmed the circuit court’s ruling.
  • The court issued a per curiam decision without a written explanation.
  • The opinion does not disclose the underlying facts, legal issues, or nature of the ruling under review.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the circuit court’s ruling in place but offers no analysis for attorneys to apply in other cases. Its practical significance is therefore limited to the disposition of Hernandez’s appeal.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top