Doctor v. State — affirmed without a written explanation

Case
Walter Doctor v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Second District Court of Appeal
Judge
Khouzam; Black; Smith
Date Decided
September 23, 2026
Docket No.
2D2025-1908
Topics
Criminal Appeals, Postconviction Procedure, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Walter Doctor appealed from a ruling of the Circuit Court for Pasco County, where Judge Gregory G. Groger presided.

The appeal proceeded under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2). The opinion does not describe Doctor’s underlying conviction, the ruling challenged, his arguments, or the State’s response.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Second District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s ruling.

The court issued a per curiam affirmance without explaining its reasoning. Judges Khouzam, Black, and Smith concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The circuit court’s ruling remains in effect.
  • The appellate court provided no factual or legal analysis.
  • The decision was unanimous among the three identified judges.

Why It Matters

The decision resolves Doctor’s appeal but offers no written reasoning for attorneys to apply in other cases. Because the opinion does not identify the issues presented or the basis for affirmance, its practical significance is limited to the disposition of this case.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top