Pappachristou — affirmed the circuit court’s ruling without a written opinion

Case
Marcelita Apostol Pappachristou v. Gary Pappachristou
Court
Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Levine; Klingensmith; Lott
Date Decided
September 24, 2026
Docket No.
4D2025-0836
Topics
Family Law, Appeals, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Marcelita Apostol Pappachristou appealed a ruling from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in Palm Beach County. Circuit Judge Karen M. Miller presided over the underlying case, docketed as No. 502024DR003974XXXAMB.

The Fourth District’s opinion does not describe the parties’ dispute, the circuit court’s ruling, or the issues raised on appeal.

The Court’s Holding

The Fourth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s ruling in a per curiam decision.

The court provided no written reasoning or discussion of the merits. Judges Levine, Klingensmith, and Lott concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The circuit court’s ruling was affirmed.
  • The appellate court issued a per curiam affirmance without an explanatory opinion.
  • The decision was not final until disposition of any timely filed motion for rehearing.

Why It Matters

The affirmance leaves the circuit court’s ruling intact. Because the court supplied no reasoning, the opinion does not explain how the panel evaluated the issues or establish a stated rule for future cases.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top