Wagner v. Mosler — Fourth District affirmed without a written opinion

Case
James Todd Wagner v. Warren B. Mosler, AVM, L.P., and III Capital Management
Court
Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Gross, J.; May, J.; Ciklin, J.
Date Decided
September 24, 2026
Docket No.
4D2025-2682
Topics
Appellate Procedure, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

James Todd Wagner appealed from a decision of the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit in Martin County. Circuit Judge Elizabeth Metzger presided over the underlying case, docketed as No. 432025CA000103CAAXMX.

Wagner represented himself on appeal. Warren B. Mosler, AVM, L.P., and III Capital Management appeared through counsel. The appellate court’s brief opinion does not describe the parties’ dispute, the circuit court’s ruling, or the arguments raised on appeal.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision in a per curiam opinion.

The court provided no reasoning or discussion of the issues and cited no authority. Judges Gross, May, and Ciklin concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The Fourth District left the circuit court’s decision in place.
  • The court issued a per curiam affirmance without explaining its reasoning.
  • The opinion states that it is not final until disposition of any timely filed motion for rehearing.

Why It Matters

The decision resolves the appeal in the appellees’ favor, subject to any timely rehearing proceedings. Because the court did not identify the issues or provide legal analysis, the opinion offers no articulated rule or reasoning for use in other cases.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top