Vaknansky v. Vaknansky — Fourth District affirms without a written explanation

Case
Arkady Vaknansky v. Karolina Vaknansky
Court
Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Levine; Klingensmith; Lott
Date Decided
September 24, 2026
Docket No.
4D2025-1153
Topics
Civil Appeals, Per Curiam Affirmance, Appellate Procedure
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Arkady Vaknansky appealed an order from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit in Broward County. Circuit Judge Lauren M. Alperstein presided over the lower-court proceeding, docketed as No. 062024DR001940AXXXCE.

The Fourth District Court of Appeal’s opinion does not describe the underlying dispute, the challenged ruling, the parties’ arguments, or the applicable legal issues.

The Court’s Holding

The Fourth District affirmed the circuit court’s decision in a per curiam opinion.

The court provided no reasoning or discussion of the merits. Judges Levine, Klingensmith, and Lott concurred in the disposition.

Key Takeaways

  • The circuit court’s ruling was affirmed.
  • The appellate court issued a per curiam affirmance without explaining its reasoning.
  • The opinion does not identify the substantive issues presented on appeal.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the circuit court’s ruling in place but supplies no written analysis for attorneys to apply in other cases. The opinion states that it is not final until disposition of any timely filed motion for rehearing.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top