Charles — Fifth District affirmed without a written opinion

Case
Corey Charles v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Lambert; Eisnaugle; Boatwright
Date Decided
September 22, 2026
Docket No.
5D2026-0398
Topics
Criminal Appeal, Per Curiam Affirmance, Appellate Procedure
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Corey Charles appealed from a judgment of the Circuit Court for St. Johns County, where Circuit Judge Christopher S. Ferebee presided. The appellate opinion identifies the lower-tribunal case as No. 2025-001030-CFMA.

The Fifth District’s opinion does not describe the underlying facts, the charges, the arguments raised on appeal, or the circuit court’s reasoning.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s judgment in a per curiam decision.

The court provided no written analysis or explanation for its disposition. Judges Lambert, Eisnaugle, and Boatwright concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The Fifth District affirmed the judgment below.
  • The decision was issued per curiam without a written explanation.
  • The opinion establishes no stated reasoning addressing the facts or legal issues presented.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the circuit court’s judgment in place but supplies no explanation of the appellate court’s reasoning. Because the opinion does not identify or analyze the issues raised, its text offers no substantive guidance beyond the result in Charles’s appeal.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top