Background
Christopher McLagan appealed from a decision of the Circuit Court for Osceola County in lower-tribunal case number 2018-DR-004632. Circuit Judge Hal C. Epperson, Jr. presided below.
The appellate court’s opinion does not describe the underlying dispute, the circuit court’s ruling, the issues raised on appeal, or the parties’ arguments. Erika McLagan appeared pro se in the appeal.
The Court’s Holding
The Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision. Judges Nardella, Mize, and Gannam concurred in the per curiam disposition.
Because the court issued only a one-word affirmance and provided no written analysis, the opinion identifies no legal rule or rationale supporting the result.
Key Takeaways
- The Sixth District affirmed the Osceola County Circuit Court’s decision.
- The decision was a per curiam affirmance without an explanatory opinion.
- The opinion supplies no facts, legal analysis, or precedential rule concerning the underlying dispute.
Why It Matters
The ruling leaves the circuit court’s disposition intact but offers no written guidance for attorneys or trial courts on the issues presented. Its significance is therefore principally limited to the parties and the outcome of this appeal.