Hall v. Stockbridge Madison — Sixth District affirmed without a written opinion

Case
Carlos Alfonso Hall v. Stockbridge Madison, LLC
Court
Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Wozniak; White; Smith
Date Decided
September 22, 2026
Docket No.
6D2025-3013
Topics
Appellate Procedure; Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Carlos Alfonso Hall appealed from a judgment or order of the County Court for Polk County in litigation against Stockbridge Madison, LLC. County Judge Rachelle E. Williamson presided over the lower-court proceeding, docketed as case number 2024-CC-004922.

Hall represented himself on appeal. Stockbridge Madison was represented by Shannon S. Fuhrman of Fuhrman Law. The appellate court’s opinion does not describe the parties’ dispute, the lower court’s reasoning, or the issues Hall raised.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal affirmed the county court’s decision. Judges Wozniak, White, and Smith concurred in the per curiam disposition.

The court provided no written analysis or explanation for its decision. The opinion was designated nonfinal until expiration of the period for filing a rehearing motion and disposition of any motion filed.

Key Takeaways

  • The Sixth District affirmed the Polk County Court’s ruling.
  • The decision was a per curiam affirmance without a written explanation.
  • The opinion does not disclose the underlying facts, legal issues, or basis for affirmance.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the county court’s ruling in place but supplies no reasoning for attorneys to apply in other cases. Its practical significance is therefore principally to the parties and the disposition of this appeal.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top