Browning v. State — First District affirmed without a written opinion

Case
Amber S Browning v. State of Florida
Court
Florida First District Court of Appeal
Judge
Bilbrey; Treadwell; Neff
Date Decided
September 25, 2026
Docket No.
1D2025-2948
Topics
Criminal Appeal; Per Curiam Affirmance; Appellate Procedure
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Amber S Browning appealed from a decision of the Circuit Court for Suwannee County, where Judge Kathryn R. Land presided.

The First District’s opinion does not identify the underlying charges, describe the proceedings below, state the issues Browning raised, or provide the parties’ arguments.

The Court’s Holding

The First District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision in a per curiam disposition.

The court supplied no written reasoning or legal analysis. Judges Bilbrey, Treadwell, and Neff concurred in the result.

Key Takeaways

  • The First District left the circuit court’s decision in place.
  • The disposition was unanimous and issued per curiam.
  • Because the court provided no reasoning, the opinion does not establish a stated rule of law or explain the basis for affirmance.

Why It Matters

The decision ends the appeal in the State’s favor unless altered through a timely and authorized motion under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331.

Its broader significance is limited because the court did not discuss the facts, appellate issues, or reasoning supporting the result.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top