Ramirez v. State — Conviction or order affirmed without a written opinion

Case
Juan J. Ramirez v. State of Florida
Court
Florida First District Court of Appeal
Judge
Osterhaus, C.J.; Kelsey, J.; Winokur, J.
Date Decided
September 24, 2026
Docket No.
1D2026-0165
Topics
Criminal Appeal, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Juan J. Ramirez, proceeding pro se, appealed from the Circuit Court for Walton County, where Circuit Judge J. Ryan Love presided.

The First District Court of Appeal’s opinion does not identify the nature of the underlying judgment or order, the facts of the case, the issues Ramirez raised, or the parties’ arguments.

The Court’s Holding

The First District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision.

The court issued a per curiam affirmance without a written explanation. Accordingly, the opinion states no legal reasoning and announces no rule beyond the disposition of this appeal.

Key Takeaways

  • The circuit court’s judgment or order remains in effect.
  • The three-judge panel unanimously concurred in the affirmance.
  • The opinion provides no factual discussion, legal analysis, or explanation for the result.

Why It Matters

The decision ends the appeal in the First District unless altered through a timely and authorized motion under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331 or through any further review that may be legally available.

Because the court affirmed without an explanatory opinion, the decision offers no substantive guidance on the legal issues involved.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top