400 Sunny Isles Marina Condominium Association — Third District affirmed under condominium-declaration precedent

Case
400 Sunny Isles Marina Condominium Association, Inc. v. 400 Sunny Isles Master Condominium Association, Inc.
Court
Florida Third District Court of Appeal
Judge
LOGUE; LINDSEY; GORDO
Date Decided
September 24, 2026
Docket No.
3D25-0062
Topics
Condominium Law; Declarations; Property Rights
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

400 Sunny Isles Marina Condominium Association appealed a decision of the Miami-Dade County Circuit Court in litigation against 400 Sunny Isles Master Condominium Association. The appellate opinion does not describe the underlying dispute, the trial court’s ruling, or the parties’ specific arguments.

The Third District disposed of the appeal in a brief per curiam opinion. Its cited authorities concern the controlling effect of condominium declarations, the treatment of documents incorporated into declarations, and the relationship between declarations and subordinate agreements.

The Court’s Holding

The Third District affirmed the circuit court’s decision without further explanation. The court cited precedent establishing that a condominium declaration strictly governs the relationships among unit owners and the condominium association and may incorporate an attached agreement as part of the declaration.

The cited cases also state that a superior declaration controls over conflicting subordinate lease language and that rights of use and enjoyment established by a declaration generally cannot be impaired without consent or a valid amendment. Because the opinion provides no factual analysis, it does not specify how those principles applied to the parties’ particular documents or claims.

Key Takeaways

  • The appellate court affirmed the circuit court’s decision.
  • Condominium declarations govern the legal relationships and property-use rights established by the condominium regime.
  • The opinion’s cited authorities indicate that declaration language controls over subordinate agreements and may incorporate attached documents.

Why It Matters

The decision reinforces the central role of the condominium declaration when courts interpret competing rights and obligations within a condominium development. Associations and their counsel should evaluate the declaration, incorporated documents, and any subordinate agreements together.

Because the court issued only a citation affirmance and supplied no factual discussion, the opinion offers limited guidance beyond the declaration-control principles reflected in the cited cases.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top