Huntington v. State — Second District affirms without explanation

Case
Nathan Huntington v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Second District Court of Appeal
Judge
Northcutt; Silberman; Labrit
Date Decided
September 30, 2026
Docket No.
2D2025-2560
Topics
Per Curiam; Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Nathan Huntington appealed from the Circuit Court for Manatee County. The abbreviated opinion identifies Frederick Mercurio as the circuit court judge associated with the appeal but does not describe the ruling under review.

The opinion provides no facts, claims, arguments, or procedural history beyond identifying the originating court and counsel for the parties.

The Court’s Holding

The Second District Court of Appeal affirmed.

The per curiam opinion contains no analysis and does not state the legal or factual basis for the court’s decision.

Key Takeaways

  • The appellate court affirmed without a written explanation.
  • The opinion does not identify the specific ruling under review.
  • Judges Northcutt, Silberman, and Labrit concurred.

Why It Matters

The decision resolves Huntington’s appeal in the State’s favor, but the abbreviated opinion supplies no reasoning or factual context from which to derive a broader legal rule.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top