Bassett v. State — Second District affirmed without a written explanation

Case
Robert Lee Bassett v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Second District Court of Appeal
Judge
Khouzam; Morris; Guard
Date Decided
September 30, 2026
Docket No.
2D2025-2736
Topics
Criminal Appeals; Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Robert Lee Bassett appealed from a decision of the Circuit Court for Pinellas County, where Judge Pat Siracusa presided. Bassett was represented on appeal by the Public Defender’s Office, and the State was represented by the Attorney General’s Office.

The appellate opinion does not describe the underlying charges, the trial court’s ruling, the issues raised on appeal, or the parties’ arguments.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Second District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision in a per curiam opinion.

The court provided no written reasoning or discussion of the merits. Judges Khouzam, Morris, and Guard concurred in the disposition.

Key Takeaways

  • The Second District affirmed the judgment under review.
  • The decision was issued per curiam without an explanatory opinion.
  • The opinion establishes no stated rule or rationale beyond the affirmance itself.

Why It Matters

The ruling leaves the circuit court’s decision in place. Because the appellate court did not explain its reasoning or identify the issues presented, the opinion provides no substantive guidance about Florida law beyond the outcome of this appeal.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top