Downs v. Dixon — affirmed the circuit court’s ruling in a per curiam decision

Case
James Earl Downs v. Richard Dixon, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, State of Florida
Court
Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Gross; Ciklin; Lott
Date Decided
October 1, 2026
Docket No.
4D2025-3272
Topics
Appellate Procedure, Corrections, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

James Earl Downs, proceeding pro se, appealed from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit in Martin County. The appellee was Richard Dixon, Secretary of the Florida Department of Corrections, State of Florida.

The opinion does not describe the underlying dispute, the circuit court’s ruling, the arguments on appeal, or the applicable legal standards.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s ruling.

The court issued a per curiam decision and provided no explanatory reasoning. Judges Gross, Ciklin, and Lott concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The Fourth District affirmed the circuit court’s ruling.
  • The decision was issued per curiam by a three-judge panel consisting of Judges Gross, Ciklin, and Lott.
  • The opinion states no facts, legal analysis, or basis for affirmance.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the circuit court’s ruling in place. Because the opinion supplies no reasoning or description of the underlying issues, it offers no substantive guidance beyond the result in this appeal.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top