Trahan v. Oleske — First District affirmed without a written opinion

Case
Richard A. Trahan v. Dr. Deanna A. Oleske, M.D.
Court
Florida First District Court of Appeal
Judge
Lewis; Kelsey; Treadwell
Date Decided
October 2, 2026
Docket No.
1D2025-3001
Topics
Appellate Procedure; Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Richard A. Trahan appealed a decision of the Circuit Court for Escambia County, where Judge Jan Shackelford presided. Dr. Deanna A. Oleske, M.D., was the appellee.

The First District’s opinion does not describe the underlying claims, the trial court’s ruling, the parties’ arguments, or the applicable law.

The Court’s Holding

The First District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision in a per curiam disposition.

The court provided no written reasoning or explanation for the affirmance. Judges Lewis, Kelsey, and Treadwell concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The circuit court’s decision was affirmed.
  • The appellate court issued a per curiam affirmance without a written explanation.
  • The disposition was not final until resolution of any timely and authorized motion under Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331.

Why It Matters

The ruling leaves the circuit court’s decision in place but supplies no reasoning that attorneys can apply to other disputes. Because the opinion does not identify the underlying issues or explain the basis for affirmance, its broader precedential significance is limited.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top